Are AGW deniers science-deniers or deniers of bad science?
The simplistic way is to ask them to post sources, so called alarmists post links to actual science site like NASA, NOAA, USGS and recognised scientists. Deneirs post links to deneirs sites that are not science based or blogs like Watts. Pretty easy to compare what deneirs invent to what the science is actually saying https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/
The only ones I have encountered have (1) not majored in science at even the bachelor's level and (2) think that a statement from someone paid by big energy is unbiased while one from a university scientist is not. There is hope for the world, though. A lot of them refuse vaccinations for themselves or their children. They may think that organic evolution is a fraud but they are wrong about that too.
The Lord Humungus.
They're science-deniers. Otherwise the chumps would have some science which proved their claims, rather than nonsense youtube videos.
AGW deniers are disgusted at the pseudoscience and sophistry presented by the Alarmists. The violations of the laws of physics and making up junk science to serve their greedy agenda.
There is no bad science for them to deny. Global warming is happening https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-latest-signs-of-climate-change And we are causing it https://globalwarmingisreal.com/2011/11/17/infographic-10-indicators-of-a-human-fingerprint-on-climate-change/ The twelve warmest years in the instrumental record are 2017, 2010, 2005, 2009, 2007, 2015, 1998, 2006, 2016, 2013, 2012 and 2014. http://climate.nasa.gov/system/internal_resources/details/original/647_Global_Temperature_Data_File.txt There is a three way tie for 10th place, 2002, 2006 and 2012.
there is no global warming there is climate change and the " experts" now predict an ice age , since they predicted that by 2000 the oceans would have risen by 10 feet we can take their predictions very lightly